Employment Shelf-Life

I like people. I’m in the business of people. I actually get paid to think about people. Yes, I sure like people.

But here’s the deal with people…a.k.a human beings: They’re fickle; they chase shiny objects; they fall in and out of love (and like). Sometimes they’re superstars and sometimes they’re vagabonds. And when it comes to their role in the workplace, all of this holds true. As much as we’d like to think we can make even the worst of human beings the best of performers – the most productive contributors – we’re wrong. We’re dead wrong.

There’s an interesting (read “maddening”) debate brewing over at Focus.Com right now on whether “culling” your stagnant resources makes sense in a talent management strategy. First of all, there’s all sorts of huffing and puffing around whether a resource can actually be “stagnant.” The term I use (quite fondly) is ‘deadwood.’ Yeah, that’s right. You can be one hell of an unproductive resource who has fallen prey to apathy, has lost a purpose, has lost a passion. You are no longer a going concern for the business. Maybe – and that’s a really freakin’ big ‘maybe’ – you still have a small spark waiting to be rekindled. But the pragmatic question for HR Professionals then becomes, “Is that resource worth our time, energy, and money likely to be expended in this rekindling exercise?”

The CEO of Focus, Scott Albro, really summed it all up for me when he wrote, “the consensus today is that poor performance and stagnation is a leadership problem as opposed to a talent problem. And there’s a reason for this – true leaders are outnumbered.” Amen, my brother. Do you know what true leaders do? Well, I can tell you what they don’t do. They don’t cow tow. They don’t avoid the tough decision. And they don’t tolerate mediocrity. It happens. Even the best of performers lose their ummph. Any sense of engagement or affiliation they once had starts to fade. They get stale. Some employees just hit an expiration date. It doesn’t matter how good your leadership team is, it doesn’t matter how hard you’ve tried to create a lasting career experience for your employees; expiration is no more unnatural in the employment life-cycle than it is in the life life-cycle.

Stop pretending our job is to make every human being live up to their greatest potential. That’s an interesting aspiration, but it’s not our job, dammit. Take a measured approach, gather the right data, ask the right questions. But find the junk that’s gone bad and help your leaders take it off the shelf.

Image Credit: ladybugbkt (via Compfight)

  • LebHR

    I hear you Charlie, there are times when employees have reached an expiry date and nothing can be done. This might be for the good of both parties, as it is definitely time for them to find something new and inspiring to them, and time for the company to find some new fresh blood.
    Nicely laid out..thanks!

    ——————-
    Check out our latest post Love Your Job | Positive Attitude
    Are you a job seeker, employee, manager, or HR fanatic? Visit LebHR.com for info and tips.
    LebHR – The Lebanese Human Resources Community

  • http://hrperspectives.wordpress.com/ Michael Brisciana

    Hi, Charlie – - –

    Excellent point re: employee “expiration dates.” It’s a very apt metaphor in many ways. My current work is in the educational industry, so I can share an example from the world of teachers …

    … a great deal of effort is expended trying to help teachers stay energized throughout their full (30+ year) career. While we all want “energized” (contributing) employees, this strikes me as SOLVING THE WRONG PROBLEM.

    It is probably unnatural and unlikely that most people can/should work happily and energetically at one job for 30+ years. Rather than trying to extend their shelf life, wouldn’t we be better off helping them transition successfully (transfer their skills) to a new line of work “when the time comes”? Wouldn’t this be more “compassionate” — and more realistic — than trying to get a “spark” out of someone who doesn’t have any more spark to give in this particular role/profession/environment?

    To your point as well … it’s not the business of any organization (for-profit or not-for-profit alike) to provide lifetime jobs for employees. It’s the business of the organization to provide goods and services to their clients. When the time comes that someone can no longer contribute to this effort, we need to help them depart. It’s the only “fair and compassionate” thing to do for all parties involved.

    Michael Brisciana

  • http://twitter.com/JennyJensHR Jennifer Payne

    Hi Charlie,
    I weighed in on the debate on Focus and have been following the ensuing discussion. I believe that those who took offense to your question missed the point that you were posing it to generate discussion and debate not to call out anyone’s viewpoint as right or wrong.

    If you really read through most of the responses, no one is suggesting that a general “house cleaning” is the right thing to do…a holistic review of who your talent is and what they are doing is something that any good HR department should do. Any business has the right to assess their goals and priorities, look at who is contributing to them, and do something about those that aren’t. Whether that’s coaching & development, reassignment, or in some cases helping the employee to move on (because the reality is that sometimes needs to be the case)…it should be our job to facilitate that process and balance both the needs of the employees and the company. Anyone that thinks that is wrong just isn’t using good business sense.

    We talk so much about wanting to be strategic contributors to our businesses….isn’t this one way to do so? By ensuring you have the right people doing the right things that contribute to overall business success? I’m not talking about throwing darts and randomly eliminating people, I’m talking about an overall talent assessment and taking action on those that aren’t doing what we need them to do to move our businesses into the future.

    Great post, and great debate!

  • http://twitter.com/atlscgrad Michael

    Well said! I think we’ve all hit that wall even in our own careers were we recognize that we are not hitting on all cylinders. This really is an area where companies do not always look to rotate employees enough throughout the organization to keep their engagement higher and their energy level up. The ‘turf wars’ and lack of information sharing that while common is also drains an organization as people whither in their position.

  • http://www.kimberlydurban.com/blog Kim

    Good article, Charlie.

  • http://twitter.com/melbenwell/status/171975739644710912 Melanie Benwell

    Yes, there is an "Employment Shelf-Life" http://t.co/dDQ0TOCq New Post! #HR #Leadership

  • http://twitter.com/hrfishbowl/status/172049414934892544 Charlie Judy, SPHR

    Thanks, Lars. Appreciate it! “@ThisIsLars: Employment Shelf-Life | @HRFishbowl http://t.co/yPm2HJVP <– great post Charlie #Leadership”

  • http://twitter.com/slcrecruiter/status/172051559616757760 Chris Brown, PHR

    Great article on #talentmanagement and #leadership – Employment Shelf-Life http://t.co/1WxIr5HV @hrfishbowl #hr #recruiting

  • Lisacox

    Typo…it doesn’t “happy” to everyone. Good article!

  • Christopher McCann

    I usually just cue up “Before They Make Me Run” on Spotify while meeting with them for their Professional Development 1:1′s…

  • http://twitter.com/sagehrms/status/172083174422228992 Sage HRMS

    Sometimes they’re superstars & sometimes they’re vagabonds… http://t.co/pxyVa5bp via @HRfishbowl #hrblogs #hr

  • http://twitter.com/hrfishbowl/status/172155174054408193 Charlie Judy, SPHR

    thx, Chris-perciate it! “@SLCRecruiter: Great article on #leadership Employment Shelf-Life http://t.co/dDQ0TOCq @hrfishbowl #hr #recruiting”

  • http://twitter.com/chrismccannit/status/172163733731295232 Chris McCann

    thx, Chris-perciate it! “@SLCRecruiter: Great article on #leadership Employment Shelf-Life http://t.co/dDQ0TOCq @hrfishbowl #hr #recruiting”

  • hrfishbowl

    appreciate it, Kim. man, it has been tooooooo long. how the heck are you?

  • hrfishbowl

    it’s amazing what you don’t catch when you read something over and over and over again. thanks for the comment!

  • http://twitter.com/lizkislik/status/172422933153718272 Liz Kislik

    Provocative! Consider! RT @hrfishbowl: do employees have an expiration date? "Employment Shelf-Life" suggests they do http://t.co/tKjJoBl9

  • http://twitter.com/sterlingedsrv/status/172442833628827648 Elizabeth Kramer

    Employment Shelf-Life | HR Fishbowl http://t.co/69Ob1GRR "Sometimes they’re superstars and sometimes they’re vagabonds." #emplaw #hr

  • http://twitter.com/akken/status/178122275021799424 Akken

    “Poor performance & stagnation is a leadership problem opposed to a talent problem…true leaders are outnumbered.” http://t.co/DuMlWpGj

  • http://twitter.com/jencbrock/status/182104707798536192 jenvilines

    RT @HRFishbowl: Employment Shelf-Life #HR #TrenchHR http://t.co/4lQERI5m